Feb 7, 2010

Controversial films bring Kinmen to life










Trees grow in an uninhabited house of southern Chinese style—a typical scene in Kinmen, as shown in Dong Cheng-liang’s “Songs of Kinmen.” (Courtesy of Firefly Image Company)

By June Tsai

For many, Kinmen is the final battlefield of the Chinese Civil War and an anti-Communist stronghold of the Cold War. In the last decade, this outlying archipelago, just a few kilometers away from Xiamen in mainland China’s Fujian Province, was opened up as a busy post for cross-strait links. Taiwanese tourists appreciate Kinmen for its unspoiled nature and simple life, as a county whose residents receive an enviable welfare package, and for the famous Kinmen liquor.

Yet how do the people of Kinmen see their own islands?

Obsolete bunkers, deserted historic sites, empty streets and yellow furrows under the feet of gnarled old farmers—these are some of the scenes that appear in the documentary film, “Songs of Kinmen,” by Kinmen-born director Dong Cheng-liang. As seen through Dong’s lens, they are not meant to be exotic. Rather, the islands are revealed not only in the context of their battle-strewn history, but also in the politics that have decisively affected their society.

“Songs of Kinmen” is part of Dong’s “1949 Trilogy,” which deals with the veteran director’s one and only subject, Kinmen. The series marks the 60th anniversary of the decisive year in which the People’s Republic of China was established on the mainland and the Republic of China government officially moved to Taiwan. That year, the Kinmen Defense Command was set up in the islands and began its long period of heavy militarization.

Although general hostilities in the civil war ended, artillery shelling continued in Kinmen from 1958 to 1977, with the People’s Liberation Army barraging Kinmen on odd-numbered days while the Nationalist army fired back on even-numbered ones to avoid really getting into a war.

The thunder of heavy artillery is thus an ineradicable memory for many Kinmen residents. So are the patriotic songs from both camps—the theme of “Songs of Kinmen”—with which residents were also continually bombarded through loudspeakers.

The documentary intermingles songs, the only audible element in the film, with visual attention to the island’s characteristic scenes—old buildings in the Southern Chinese architectural style, political slogans inscribed on fortifications and tunnels, sorghum and vegetable fields, beach minefields and soldiers’ cemeteries.

Tunes praising “Chairman Mao” and the rising red sun in the East, and melodic celebrations of the heroism of ROC soldiers and the brilliant leadership of “President Chiang” run alternately throughout the film, fiery-spirited or heart-melting. However, they are made ironic by the speechless human subjects and landscapes appearing before the viewer’s eyes.

“We were brought up virtually forced to listen to patriotic songs from both sides, and there was no way to avoid them,” the 48-year-old Dong said after the film was screened in the ROC Control Yuan in December. “With this documentary, I would like to give a voice to those who must always bear the brunt of changes in cross-strait politics.”

Indeed, Dong has been speaking up for the people of Kinmen for over 20 years. His critical examinations of problems arising from Kinmen’s position in history and his concentrated views of every inch of his home territory are his trademarks.

The movie aficionado got his first video equipment in Taiwan at a time when Kinmen residents were prohibited from even owning a radio. His film projects in the 1990s contributed to the lifting of the ban. Later, thanks to collective campaigns by Kinmen people based on Taiwan proper, in which Dong played a major role, the military control of the island was replaced by an elected civilian government in 1992, five years after the ending of martial law on Taiwan and Penghu. The demilitarized islands were made into a national park and tourism was allowed.

Beginning in the new century, Kinmen underwent another twist of fate: it became Taiwan’s frontline for test runs of postal, transportation and trade links with mainland China.

Has Kinmen’s liberation helped bring about prosperity and better living conditions? The independent director’s answer is polemic. In “Golden Liquor,” Dong portrays Kinmen as a fat but spiritually barren county. The 75-minute documentary delves into political and social problems behind the seemingly prosperous business of the world-renowned Kinmen Kaoliang.

A local family led by Yeh Hwa-chen first produced the strong distilled liquor in 1950. In 1953, the military enlisted Yeh’s help and skill to produce the beverage on a larger scale. The distillery later became a government monopoly. Its products rose to international fame and won a brand name for Kinmen. Today the Kinmen Kaoliang Liquor Inc., with two factories, boasts an annual turnover of NT$11 billion (US$344.6 million).

For Dong, behind this shining number is a culture driven by greed. In the beginning of the film, an announcer speaks through a village office loudspeaker urging people to buy the liquor. As the film goes on, one comes to learn that the Kinmen County Government’s social welfare policies include allowing each registered county resident to buy liquor regularly at a low price and legally resell it at a higher price. From officials to teachers and taxi drivers—everyone shares in the practice.

“Year by year, each household has stockpiled a rich hoard of the liquor, which they plan to sell. Some have such a large stock that they have turned former air-raid shelters into wine cellars,” Dong said. This is particularly sad in contrast to the lack of development in the island’s economy and cultural life. “With the profits from the direct sale of the liquor, we could have rounded up the island’s heritage sites into a world attraction. Instead, those in power only know how to buy voters’ support by giving out liquor vouchers and most people are intoxicated,” he lamented.

Moreover, the opening of links with the mainland seems only to have contributed to the outflow of people and economy to the other side. “There has been real urban development in Xiamen, while in Kinmen, the streets have become emptier than ever before,” Dong observed.

His disappointment demonstrates itself in the third film of the trilogy, “My Testament,” featuring Jincheng Township’s Gugang Lake. One man’s narration about a childhood spent mostly playing and working around and in the lake goes with scenes of empty surroundings or historically irrelevant renovations—a sense of despair oozes from the film.

Dong’s critical views are of course repellent to some ears. After showing “Songs of Kinmen” to the county’s descendents in Taipei, for example, Dong was advised to forget about the past, look to the future and make films showing a brighter side to the islands. And following the premiere of “Golden Liquor” in Kinmen last October, Dong even received phone threats demanding he stop future screenings.

For still others, however, the director is a gem for being so outspoken in addressing the inconvenient truth. “I appreciate his critical perspective, which is actually out of love for home,” said Kinmen-born Janice Tsai, owner of a Taipei-based bookstore. “Having grown up in the same repressed environment, I know how difficult it is to do a creative and relevant job.”

His artistic efforts have drawn the government’s attention to the hitherto marginalized island group’s potential to become a world heritage site. There are also ideas to make a museum of the whole archipelago, with its 1,400 years of history. One of the main draws would be the rare meeting of southern Chinese culture and war in these islands.

Dong knows that without the enlightenment of his people, these efforts will be for naught. By making his films and showing them to Kinmen residents, the director wants to awaken his island compatriots, as well as decision-makers, from narrow concerns for personal interests, so they can all work together for Kinmen’s cultural and economic revival.

“We have been looking forward to Kinmen’s development for 20 years. The progress seems too slow,” he said.

This article is published in Taiwan Today Jan. 29, 2010.

Jan 21, 2010

Melamine scare boosts breastfeeding practice

By June Tsai

Melamine contaminated products have sickened thousands of infants in mainland China and left several dead. These tragic deaths and the fear of feeding children toxic products have raised Taiwanese mothers' interest in breastfeeding.

Hospitals in Taipei reported a 30-percent surge in the number of expectant mothers registering to their breastfeeding classes since the melamine scare. Mothers who had just weaned their babies also came to seek advice on how to start breastfeeding again.

According to a survey made by Taiwan's Bureau of Health Promotion in 2004, only 30 percent of new moms started exclusive breastfeeding. This compared to over 70 percent in the United States and 99 percent in Norway. The survey also showed this number fell to 13 percent six months after delivery. Even the rate of mothers feeding children under six months old with a mix of breast milk and formula milk was stunningly low: 20 percent only. This means up to 80 percent of young children in Taiwan relied on infant formula. No wonder any news about tainted formula would trigger panic among parents.

Local groups made urgent calls to renew support for breastfeeding and to provide public facilities to this end. The Breastfeeding Association of Taiwan stated Sept. 20 there had been several occasions in recent years when international companies, such as Nestle in 2004, were forced to recall batches of tainted infant formula. Companies may take prompt measures to ensure safety and health agencies may multiply food checks, but in the end, "breastfeeding is still the best option with regard to immunity protection, nutrition and better mother-baby relationship."

Despite long-time efforts of related government agencies such as the BHP and nonprofit organizations in promoting breastfeeding and encourage social support, the lack of facilities has prevented many new moms from breastfeeding.

In addition to the present regulation on maternity leave which allows pregnant women to take eight weeks of paid leave around delivery time, the Gender Equality in Employment Act amended in April 2007 stipulates an unpaid parental leave up to two years. Yet women are still concerned about losing their jobs or being bullied if they decide to take parental leave.

In addition, both the gender equality law and Labor Standard Act stipulate that a female worker is allowed to breastfeed her baby twice a day, each time for 30 minutes, until it is one year old, and that this shall be deemed as working time. However, because of the lack of breastfeeding rooms at the workplace, the laws could remain just words. "The lack of public facilities is one of the biggest deterrents," said Chen Chao-huei, president of Taiwan Academy of Breastfeeding, citing the BHP's 2004 survey that showed there were less than 1,000 nursing rooms available in public buildings throughout Taiwan.

"The workplace could show support simply by implementing the law," said Chen Yi-chun, director of the Breastfeeding Association.

While 29 percent of the mothers responding to a survey conducted by the BHP in August said they were deterred from breastfeeding by the lack of adequate public facilities, 19 percent revealed their mothers-in-law influenced them, and 10 percent held their neighbors and bosses responsible. Moreover, 57 percent of respondents said their husbands were their biggest support.

"These results show that everyone around a new mother can affect her decision about breastfeeding," Chen Chao-huei said.

She also pointed to the unrestrained advertisement for infant formula in the country. The power of advertisement is such that many people are convinced that human milk is less nutritious than formula milk.

Just in June this year, for example, professionals had to dispute a local media report about tests that concluded formula milk had a higher content of iron than breast milk. "Breast milk contains less iron than formula, yet it is far better absorbed," Chen Chao-huei said. Experts estimate that 50 to 70 percent of the iron in human milk is absorbed compared to only 4 to 10 percent in formula.

Because of this low absorption rate, iron is added into formula to ensure babies absorb enough iron, Chen Yi-chun explained. While the extra iron is metabolized, the process strains needlessly the babies' kidneys, she warned.

Taiwan Academy of Breastfeeding recommended a proper distribution of information concerning infant formulas since some companies tend to advertise beyond the measures specified in the "International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes" promulgated by World Health Organization in 1981. A majority of women complained about marketing personnel contacting them, even though the Code specifically stipulates they should not seek direct or indirect contact with pregnant women or mothers of infants and young children. The organization said government agencies should be responsible for implementing the Code in Taiwan.

The Breastfeeding Association cited the WHO's 1990 "Innocenti Declaration." This document stated that as a global goal for optimal maternal and child health and nutrition, mothers should be able to practice exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of a child's life, and that children should continue to be breastfed up to two years old or beyond, with gradual introduction of age-appropriate complementary foods.

To achieve this goal, the association reminded the responsibility should not fall only upon mothers. "Everyone, including health care and education professionals, can and should help create an appropriate environment of awareness and support to encourage mothers to breastfeed."

This article appears in Taiwan Journal Oct. 16, 2008.

Jan 18, 2010

New law governs search for nuclear waste site

By June Tsai

This article was published in Taiwan Jouranl May 12, 2006. I post it here, at this time, just to remind us of the continuning plight of the Taos on Lanyu.


The Legislature passed legislation April 28 that governs how officials must go about locating a storage site for Taiwan's low-level radioactive waste. According to the new law, the government must obtain approval from residents of any area being considered as a disposal site for the thousands of barrels now stored on Orchid Island, as well as for additional waste being generated by the nation's three nuclear power plants. Residents must decide, via plebiscite, whether or not they will accept such a storage facility in their backyard before the central government can shortlist the site for final selection.

The law also stipulates that the administration responsible for operating the nuclear waste storage facility--which is the state-run utility Taiwan Power Co., or Taipower--must pay a maximum of US$156.5 million in compensatory remuneration to residents of whatever location is chosen as a depository for the waste. The law directs the Ministry of Economic Affairs to form a panel of independent experts and members of related agencies to identify potential waste disposal sites. This committee must propose at least two sites prior to final selection.

After the initial list of potential sites is released to the public, individuals, agencies and organizations may submit their opinions for discussion and debate for a period of six months. During this period of public discussion, the relevant county governments will hold a vote to let residents decide if they agree with the locations in question.

The regional plebiscite held for this purpose may exclude the application of related regulations of the nation's Referendum Act. If residents disapprove of their town for the site of the waste disposal, the site cannot be shortlisted again.

Only areas that are not affected by excessive earthquakes due to their proximity to fault lines, or to instability caused by other geological processes, can be considered as storage depots for the dangerous waste. Likewise, districts that have been designated environmentally protected areas should be excluded.

The plebiscite clause was initiated by Kuomintang legislator Justin Huang and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator Cheng Yun-peng. Huang said he was pleased to see that the version of the bill that incorporated his referendum mechanism passed, and added that all levels of government must abide by the law and proceed with the selection of a new storage site in a manner that is transparent and accountable to the public.

Officials of the DPP-led government have long been mulling over a regulation that would solve the controversial issue of where to dispose of the nation's low-level nuclear waste, which for over 20 years has been stored at a facility on Orchid Island, also known as Lanyu.

The country's first nuclear power plant went into operation in 1977. According to Niclas Ericsson writing in the Harvard Asia Quarterly, that same year, the government proposed building a factory to create jobs on Orchid Island, located 42 kilometers off the southeast coast of Taiwan proper. The island is inhabited primarily by members of the Yami aboriginal ethnic group, also known as the Tao. Once the ROC Atomic Energy Council (AEC) completed construction in 1982, it was discovered that the facility was actually a storage site for nuclear waste. Since 1982, Taipower has been dumping its low-level nuclear waste there. The AEC handed managerial control of the facility over to Taipower in 1990 on the condition that the waste be relocated elsewhere by the end of 2002.

Since the 1980s, the Yami have been appealing to the government to remove the waste from their land, staging protests and sit-ins to let the public know about their cause.

During the presidential campaign of 2000, Chen Shui-bian promised the residents of Orchid Island that, if elected president, he would have the waste removed by 2002.

Taiwan's Central News Agency quoted a local politician as saying that many residents of Orchid Island actually would not mind keeping the waste storage facility right where it is. As compensation for putting up with the nuclear waste stored on Lanyu, Taipower provides free electricity and health insurance payments, as well as other monetary compensation, to the residents of the economically depressed area. If the waste were removed, few people would be able to afford such amenities. The politician in question made the comments on condition of anonymity.

Meanwhile, long-term observers of the anti-nuclear waste movement on the tiny island deplore the situation facing the island's inhabitants.

"It is difficult to oppose nuclear energy, especially on remote Orchid Island," said Ho Tsung-hsun, secretary-general of Taiwan Environmental Protection Union. He explained that many residents feel they have to make compromises because of the social and financial disadvantages they face.

Taipower confirmed that, since 2003, its waste management personnel have been inspecting and refurbishing the nuclear waste storage bins in preparation for removing them from the island. Of the 97,672 barrels of nuclear waste being stored on Orchid Island, 8,684 have been inspected and prepared. The job is expected to take until 2010.

Huang's constituency is in Taitung County, under whose jurisdiction Orchid Island falls. He said he welcomed passage of the bill but was absolutely opposed to having any more radioactive waste stored in his constituency. The government has long been eyeing parts of Dawu Township of the same county as an alternative to the Orchid Island storage facility.